Sunday, January 6, 2008

THE MYSTERY ABOUT THE PENTAON ATTACT

The whole in the pentagon was about 5 times smaller than the plane. Geometry teaches us that if a car runs into the side of a building, that the whole in the building would be the size if a small golf cart. Ok, hypothetically let's say that a plane actually did hit the pentagon, cameras would have captured it from every angle. The pentagon has over 70 cameras out side of the building. Not one camera captures a clear picture of the plane. Why is this? The pentagon has the best defense system in the world and it has it's own missile system. If any object gets within 100 miles of the pentagon, F-15's will be scrambled if the plane doesn't completely identify it self. This individual plane was already reported hijacked and was on the wrong course but nothing happened once again. If they don't comply they could be shot down by the F-15's or the pentagon's personal missile system. Why didn't this happen? The plane that hit the pentagon left no realistic debris. U.S. military analysts Steve Colbert said that the whole in the pentagon looks like a missile attact. I raise the question whether the government wasn't telling us the whole truth. I will leave it to you to choose an answer.
How could a plane of this size travelling at 480 mph cause so little damage and vanish so completely? It's probably time to take a look at the evidence.
Clearly a Boeing passenger jet travelling at over 450 mph has not penetrated the building at this point. There is no scar or entry hole that could possibly support this scenario. Neither is there any wreckage to be seen in front of the building. Precious little wreckage was found inside the building either. The plane — or whatever it was that hit the Pentagon — seems to have vaporized prior to impact and vanished into thin air. Planes are not generally believed able to do this.

No comments: